Why Is Legally Blonde 2 so Bad

This state of willpower makes Elle appear less brilliant and not just superficial, a distinction that was made quite cleanly the first time, as well as the gentle stupidity that blondes were a slandered minority. The sequel makes the soft variations of a theme so obvious that it`s as much a children`s movie as anything else, despite the hoochy-riffy dance act in the Senate designed to get Congress to support Elle`s anti-cruelty amendment, which she calls Bruiser`s bill. Unfortunately, I have to agree with the reviews: the sequel, Legal Blonde 2: Red, White and Blonde, is disappointing. I thought the jokes fell flat (although most people laughed at the theater). The premise that the blonde bombshell is much smarter than she looks was barely strong enough to support the first film and couldn`t support the sequel. But you know what? I think the film is a valuable contribution to pop culture and I`m glad it was made. Let`s not forget that pop culture is the greatest teacher the world has ever known. Most people get most of their information and opinions from news and pop culture sources. As many studies (under the heading “cultivation theory”) have shown, people forget that the data on which they base many of their opinions comes from fictional stories on television or in movies.

They do not “remove” this data to account for the fact that it comes from fiction. In a different theoretical approach to cultural theory (“active audience”), viewers give the material their own twist and often arrive at interpretations different from those intended by the creators of the film or television show. How many films have dealt with the legislative process? There have been quite a few movies and TV shows about the presidency and others about the Supreme Court, but how many can you name about Congress? It`s true.. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), the classic by Frank Capra and James Stewart. Maybe one in a thousand young people has seen it. The same is true of Advise and Consent (1962), which concerns the Senate`s consideration of a presidential appointment. And now, what else do you have? A few interesting films are about congressional campaigns – The Candidate (1972) and Bulworth (1998) come to mind – and there have been a few films about congressional investigations (HUAC in particular) – but what about the images dealing with the legislative process? Other than Mr. Smith and a few old westerns like Gene Autry`s Rovin` Tumbleweeds (1939) and a few forgotten TV shows and parodies of Simpson, I don`t see any. Given the centrality of pop culture in our bourgeois lives and the enormous importance of what`s happening at Capital Hill, that`s a huge gap. He is one of the producer`s children with a blonde wig. Next.

Parents should know that Legally Blonde 2: Red, White, and Blonde is a sequel to 2003 in which a blonde sister who found a way to succeed while studying at Harvard Law School must now find a way to succeed on Capitol Hill. This film has some sexual references, including a plot development with gay dogs. While the film is a comedy and famous supposedly staying true to who you are, there`s also an element of both the mockery of the “blonde ditzy” stereotype and the useless social message: “The attractive, materialistic, blonde-haired rich sorority-rich white girls who grew up in Bel Air are people too!” It might also be interesting for some families to see how far our society has progressed, how homosexuality is now perceived compared to 2003, when it was still a punchline to let politicians and the media make a fuss about how gay two dogs are. In addition, the topic of animal testing in cosmetics companies` labs could have been covered a little more thoroughly without sacrificing all the comedic feel of the film. Blasphemy includes “kickass,” “ass,” “shit,” “whore,” and “hell.” Reference to a dog “turning tricks” on a street corner in Hollywood to survive – associated with the image of a dog standing behind a deck of cards on a street corner. Suggestion of oral sex. A cover of Maxim magazine, which reports on the main character`s crusade to stop laboratory testing on dogs, has the title: “Doing it doggie style”. Fresh out of her victory at Harvard University, she is now even blonder, pinker and fluffier than before. Having already conquered the system and proven to be the most right-wing eagle, this time she has more than a blonde ambition in mind. Witherspoon is still adorable, but LEGAL BLONDE 2 suffers from sequels.

This happens when the movie studio desperately wants to repeat the success of an original, but the happy ending of the first leaves very little room for further development, so they just repeat it. In this case, it even means repeating some of the same jokes. In the first film, the president of the sorority, Elle Woods, discovered that she had a brain. The pleasure of the film for the audience was to drink our cupcake and respect it too, which was possible because we could enjoy his adorable reaction to the very serious Harvard Law School and then see his triumph by being both kinder and smarter than anyone else. This triumph included professional and romantic happy endings. What else? OTHER EDITOR`S NOTES: This is a movie for teens and adults only. The phrase “Oh my G-d” is often used. There are various adult jokes, some sexual innuendo, and foul language (including “H-ly cr-p” and “Give `em h-ll”). Although this movie is non-violent, relatively clean for a PG-13 movie, and scores good points, some parents may choose to have it skipped by their teens because of their opinions on the following content. Oh, well. For the pure nostalgia factor and because it actually qualifies as a bad movie, here are 27 unacceptable things from Legally Blonde 2.

Director: Charles Herman-Wurmfeld; written by Kate Kondell, based on a story by Eve Ahlert, Dennis Drake and Mrs. Kondell, based on characters by Amanda Brown; cinematographer Elliot Davis; edited by Peter Teschner; music by Rolfe Kent; Production Designer, Missy Stewart; costumes by Sophie by Rakoff Carbonell; produced by Marc Platt and David Nicksay; published by Metro Goldwyn Meyer Pictures. Duration: 95 minutes. This film is rated PG-13. Now the machine wakes up and realizes it has to crush Smith, but Senator Paine has concerns. However, his main supporters forced him to do so. In a fascinating scene, Paine tries to justify the fact that he is a tool of the party machine; By playing ball with the machine, he was able to obtain numerous federal subsidies to the state. This corresponds to scenes in LB2 in which MP Rudd traded her support for the Animal Testing Act to pass other, perhaps more important, laws.

She would definitely be a Starbucks girl, and she certainly wouldn`t be caught dead in a mulberry skirt suit. At the end of the film, when Mrs. Witherspoon winks at the camera, it`s almost like the warning at the end of “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”: You`re next. The makers of this film, like those behind the recent “Down With Love,” seem determined to create an image that consists only of outward gestures and frills. These matte vanilla pop pies are all contextual and not subtext, a guess that at least “Legal Blonde” didn`t make. This time, it feels like pink is last year`s black. She (Reese Witherspoon) hires a detective to find the biological mother of her dog Bruiser so she can invite Bruiser`s family to his wedding. She discovers that her mother is in a laboratory testing cosmetics on animals. When she urged her law firm to speak out against the use of animal testing in cosmetics (the film was careful to stay away from the topic of animal testing for drugs), she was fired. So she travels to Washington to pass a law (“Bruiser`s Law”) and free Bruiser`s mother and all other laboratory animals. Read stories about those who struggle with homosexuality – Go.

Smith is completely naïve and believes in the good faith of the famous people around him. He is ridiculed by everyone, especially the press. To prevent him from resigning, Paine encouraged him to introduce his own bill for a national boys` camp. He receives critical support from Clarissa Saunders, a cynical collaborator (Jean Arthur), who helps him draft and explains the entire legislative process. However, the camp would be located on Willet Creek — exactly the area Paine`s buddies designated for the dam. Saunders gives Smith a clue to what is really going on, and he decides to stop the twisted Willet Creek Dam. Unbiased reviews of Common Sense Media are created by experts and are not influenced by the creators of the product or by our funders, affiliates or partners. The vision of Congress in the film is desperately simple and idealistic. The characters have the same types of instant conversions that are standard in sitcoms, where the unenlightened resist something, have a sudden epiphany, and see the light.

Think of Stan, a self-proclaimed Southern conservative who, along with Elle, discovers that their two dogs are gay and have fallen in love with each other.